The levels of stupidity that the Human animal as a collective descends into at times is enough to make a grown man cry. It really is. A prime example follows the “jump”.
I do not know the actress named Scarlett Johansson from Eve. She might be, on average, the most clever person who ever lived. But the following image is one of the most aggravatingly stupid things I have seen anyone say lately.
The reason this statement is so highly aggravating can be seen in this video (among others):
Now, in response to the still above campaign still, I invite Miss Johansson to watch the video I have just linked. Really watch it.
Miss Johansson, I have several questions I wish to ask you. In no particular order:
The autism civil rights movement feels that curing a person of autism is akin to curing them of what makes them them. Or to use another analogy, ripping out that person’s brain and putting another person behind their eyes. Would you be okay with people doing that to you? If not, why are you supporting the candidacy of a would-be President who is okay with people trying to do that to us?
Many autistic children have been killed in a mad pursuit for a cure that does not exist. A pursuit that has led parents towards quacks who have used methodologies on children that not only are not proven to do what the quacks claim, but lack a plausible rationale. Hillary Clinton has thanked one of the biggest promoters of this quackery for their work with “autism spectrum disorders”. Why would you, a taxpaying citizen, want such a person making decisions on the behalf of some three hundred million citizens?
The idea of a woman being elected President is one that drives a lot of women to hopeful proclamations and statements that the time has come and so forth. I, however, believe in the right person for the job. I can also think of many celebrities who would make a far better President when the above (and below) questions are taken into account. Chaz Ebert is one name that comes to my mind lately. Pretend Hillary is very male for a second please, Miss Johansson. Would you still be as enthusiastic about her running for office?
There is a popular “law” of electronic discussion boards that the first side to invoke comparisons to Adolf Hitler automatically loses. However, they forgot to put in a sidenote stating that the rule loses any weight it had when the comparison is valid. Well, if you imagine Hillary saying cure and prevent being black, being Asian, or being Hispanic, you can see the comparison is not only valid, but apt. The Anal Cunt song I Went Back In Time And Voted For Hitler is funny. Voting for someone who wants to do something Hitler-like to people on the basis of a characteristic they cannot help is not. How do you defend Hillary Clinton’s support of a murderous group of normalists who want to exterminate a group of people whose only defining characteristic is their neurology, and thus can be any colour, sex, or orientation under the sun?
Pretty much every autistic individual, US citizen or no, feels that Autism Speaks’ behaviour meets the classical definition of fraud, and thus should be prosecuted. Hillary Clinton seems to believe they should be congratulated and worked with by a government that was ostensibly founded on the rights of citizens being protected. How do you justify supporting this?
You can never really know for certain whom amongst you is autistic or not. You yourself, Miss Johansson, have been in films where your co-stars have played characters who correspond to specific “types” of autistic adult. The Einstein type (Robert Downey junior‘s portrayal of Tony Stark) and the Powell type (Mark Ruffalo‘s portrayal of Bruce Banner). The number of accidental portrayals of an autistic individual in film grows by the year, whilst deliberate attempts to portray the autistic in film have been met with scorn, condemnation, and outright anger. Point is, Miss Johansson, by supporting the efforts of a President-wannabe who supports the eradication of the autistic, you never know whom you might be condemning. How can you face past, present, or future coworkers, in light of that?
And so on. Hillary Clinton being President is not a step forward for autism civil rights. And if something is not a step forward for one minority group, then it is logically speaking a step backwards for everyone.
I thought that we had put this to rest when the Democrats had put Barack Obama up to be their candidate in the 2008 polls.
I think the reason you offer for your support of Hillary Clinton is also ironic, Miss Johansson. You see, the people most responsible for the existence of what I deride as Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes, and the people who have made the most public moves to support the organised murder of the autistic, have been women. This proves that women can also be the most callous, normalistic, and hateful people on Earth. In fact, you need not even look that far. Simply go to any public forum where people are speaking in support of the murder of autistic individuals, and voice objections. Women are frequently the ones asking for permission to murder their autistic children.
If it were possible for all of us to live in a vacuum, then Hillary Clinton would be a perfectly acceptable choice to be President of the United States Of America. Unfortunately, when the Human population of the world has passed seven billion a couple of years ago, it is safe to say that not only are people no longer capable of putting themselves in a vacuum, neither are nations.
And let us be brutally honest. America has never put itself in a vacuum when it comes to dealing with other nations. The benefits of its existence, it has tried to confine to itself. But the fallout from its policies, it has had no trouble spreading everywhere. Vietnam, Cambodia, Iraq, and Afghanistan are just the best-known examples of foreign nations where America’s attitude that it should be emulated by the rest of the world has resulted in untold suffering to people that it never even takes into consideration.
Miss Johansson, people of the world everywhere, I would dearly love to see a diverse and different point of view or series of viewpoints running the show in America. However, the problem is most certainly not confined to the person nominally in charge of the show. The problem we presently face is one that started by infecting the roots, and is now so widespread that it may well be a better idea in the long-term to dig out the tree, throw it away, and wait for the soil to be able to grow something else in its place.
It is for reasons like this, Miss Johansson, that not only can I not join you in supporting Hillary Clinton to be the first woman to be elected President of the United States of America, I cannot even support the sentiment that a woman in charge of the nation would change anything. If the experience of autistic individuals living in Australia is anything to go by, it will change absolutely nothing.
Kevin “Helping Children With Autism” Rudd was told that his party no longer wanted him to be known as the Prime Minister of Australia before. He was shown the door, and a woman named Julia Gillard put into his place. Not only was the Helping Children With Autism policy, a policy with a name that in just four words manages to offend me twice over, never retracted, but Gillard was made to leave and replaced with Rudd again. This is the autistic experience of having a woman in charge. And it is the basis on which I am telling you that unless you and Hillary have plans to rip out the entire tree and replace it with something that says (among a good many other things) that Autism Speaks is not a charity but rather a hate group, I simply cannot join you in supporting her to be elected to lead the increasingly rotten tree.
When the women of both America and the world start to say “hang on, let’s not replace only the head, but replace the whole hydra”, I will be behind them a hundred percent. But the two-minute video above clearly states why as long as they are determined to put a chairman into an increasingly sick and disgusting corporation whose ambitions in one important respect differ only from Adolf’s in terms of ability to execute rather than content, I cannot support them.
How many times do people have to hear other people saying the word no, Miss Johansson?
And Miss Johansson, poisoned trees have a way of spreading their sickness to those who try to hold them up.