One rascal called Godwin has a law named after him. In a political argument, this law goes, the first side to compare the other to Adolf Hitler automatically loses the argument.
When the argument is about school crossings, traffic lights, home video ratings, or similar peripheral things that only have the tiniest level of consequence in other peoples’ lives, Godwin’s law is very valid. It takes a special level of dimwit to try to compare a speaker who wishes to tighten up the restrictions concerning what teenagers are allowed to see in theatres to genocide. And to the credit of the Human race, this activity has diminished somewhat since the Internet and predecessors like EchoMail have become more public.
But this also allows or encourages people to think that the Shoah and Adolf were unique things in Human history. They are not. Around the same time as Germany slowly lost the second World War, the Japanese managed to enact their own Holocaust in Nanking that caused one observer from the Red Cross to state that he never knew such cruel people really existed in this world. Decades later, Pol Pot wiped out a quarter of his country’s population whilst trying to turn it into a “paradise” where only farmers and warriors were deemed worthy to live. I will bite my tongue about my hatred of rurals this time.
The point here is that whilst Adolf Hitler is the greatest mass murderer on record, and is expected to remain such for eons to come, it is not for lack of effort on other parts.
Which brings me to Suzanne Wright.
In 1944, Hans Frank (no relation to Anne) wrote the following in his diary:
Gentlemen, I must ask you to rid yourself of all feeling of pity. We must annihilate the Jews, wherever we find them and wherever it is possible, in order to maintain the structure of the Reich as a whole. …
Dehumanisation of the victim is a vital, even essential step in any genocide. This is why Suzanne Wright refuses to speak about autistic adults at all, and refers to autistic children as “lost”, “missing”, and so forth. Because to concede for a moment that autistic individuals might have valid thoughts and feelings of their own makes it that much harder to destroy them. Keep this in mind for a moment.
On January 30, 1939, Adolf Hitler said this to the Reichstag:
Today I want to be a prophet once more: if international finance Jewry inside and outside of Europe should succeed once more in plunging nations into another world war, the consequence will not be the Bolshevation of the earth and thereby the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.
Both of these quotes are from Question One of Nizkor.org’s response to 66 Questions And Answers About The Holocaust.
Suzanne Wright has stated to the public at least once that she wants autism to be a word only read about in history books. There are numerous problems with that. For one, put any word you can think of to describe any group of Humans in the world in there with that statement. For example, “I want Queenslander to be a word only read about in history books”. Whilst my capacity to miss my parental units’ favourite people is non-existent, I have no doubt in my mind that people from all over the world, not just Queenslanders, would have strenuous objections. Black people, white people, asians, tall people, short people, people with funny voices, you name it. There is no context in which it is acceptable to say “I want this group of people to only be read about in history books”. And make no mistake about this. When you say autism, you mean autistic people.
Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes’ drives to solicit funds not only have no benefit whatsoever for autistic people, but in light of their posing as a benevolent charity organisation, should be considered fraudulent.
During the Nazi regime, many Jewish and Gypsy children were confronted with the realisation that a powerful government wanted them dead. I have no doubt in my mind that this left them with serious psychological scars that continued to manifest throughout their lives. Such is happening to the autistic children of today. Children are not stupid, and autistic children have an uncanny knack for knowing when something is wrong in their immediate space. How many autistic children must be confronted with the realisation that their parental units cannot deal with them as they are, and wish to murder them in the hopes of replacing them with something more to their parental units’ liking?
So far, we have Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes demonstrably guilty of fraud and mass child abuse.
Stories of children dying from “treatments” that lack plausible rationale but are applied in the hopes of making them “not autistic anymore” used to appear frequently. No autistic adult today believes that this activity has actually stopped. And Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes can be blamed for this due to several of their behaviours. One, they demonise the autistic and falsely make unconnected folk believe that everyone would rather be dead than autistic. A good look through this journal for statements to the effect that I would rather be dead than anything like my parental units is enough to set anyone straight about that. Secondly, although I cannot prove this at present, there is much of a track record in which Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes patently do not care about the weight of scientific evidence. They will simply post and publicise any inflammatory garbage they can in the hopes of selling “cures” that actually turn out to be murder.
This is an especially important point. Andrew Wakefield has not only been stripped of his doctor status, but mercilessly shown to be a fraud for his paper that proclaimed autism to be caused by vaccines. Any child that dies as a result of loss of herd immunity to preventable disease is therefore also on curebie heads, including those of Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes.
Also worth thinking about is the misappropriation of taxes. Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes pays some of its staff tens of millions of dollars, and furnishes celebrities with tens of millions of dollars, to further their cause. Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes enjoys the same taxation exemptions as actual charities that help the people they claim they help, such as Diabetes America. This means that Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes is effectively a money sink draining funds away from the public purse. As I am presently homeless and ill, I would personally rather see ten million dollars used to provide twenty houses in central Parramatta. There are many other examples of better ways to spend public funds that can and sometimes will benefit autistic people. I frequently refer to real estate agents as parasites, lawmakers of the world. Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes is the only example of a parasite I can think of where the people it is leeching from are fully aware of its existence, yet it thrives anyway.
We also have precedents in terms of legality. No organisation proclaiming that black people are a drain on the public purse and therefore should be cured of being black would be tolerated in America. Why the autistic should be treated any differently is a question that begs an answer.
Godwin’s law has it that all comparisons of people living today to Adolf Hitler are wrong automatically. Well, Godwin can eat me. Not only is comparing Suzanne Wright to Adolf Hitler warranted, but I think her latest statements of her plans for the autistic make it apt.
This leaves all democratic nations in a quandary. By tolerating Suzanne Wright’s behaviour and by tolerating the existence of Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes, you are tolerating a group of people who want to be compared with Nazis.
I used to think America and England were better than that.