Let us get this out of the way first: compared to when it started, I am adding things to this journal at a very slow pace, and I do not anticipate that changing any time soon. Part of the reason has to do with simple loss of morale. Some of it has to do with feelings of exclusion from the mainstream “autistic community”. But much of it has to do with a simple feeling of it not being worth the effort.
Autistic people live daily with the threat of organised violence from an organisation that has been called a charity in one country, or governments and people who have bought that “charity”’s lies. If an autistic adult whose life has gone very wrong feels that every person they speak to might be sizing them up for “curing” (read: murdering), that is their right and obligation.
Which brings me to one question I want to ask some people lately.
Who the fukk do you think you are?
So without further ado, let me cover some points that people who selectively read this journal apparently do not get.
There are some people who have been diagnosed and rediagnosed as autistic enough times that when you challenge their diagnosis, the burden of evidence actually rests with you.
I will admit this much. I am lousy with remembering names. I can meet people over and over and not remember their names at all. It is sometimes embarrassing, occasionally creepy, and sometimes even aggravating. But when I see people enough times, I develop an instinctive response to remember their face well, and associate it with ideas. This is especially the case when said faces are associated with good things, or the promise of good things.
I remember Doctor Isabelle Hénault’s face very well. I remember her name and words very easily for one simple reason. If I were to tell a group of actual experts concerning autism or even poseurs thereof that there is far too much focus on children, children, children, and that autistic adults and adolescents are being done serious disservice by this, Hénault would be amongst those expressing agreement with me.
You may have also gotten the impression that I have met Doctor Isabelle Hénault in person by reading what I have written thus far. I have. She agrees that I am autistic.
I will be brief about the man who is considered Australia’s foremost expert on the subject of autism, Doctor Anthony Attwood. Yes, I have met him, too. In fact, it is through him that I met Hénault. You know where this is going, then. He agrees that I am autistic.
Attwood also runs and works with a place in inner Brisbane where numerous specialists in autism can be found. I have met at least two or three other Doctors of psychology at that place. I have not encountered any dispute from them that I am autistic.
Add to this two people at a workplace rehabilitation service branch in a place I would rather forget. One a rehabilitation consultant who has worked with enough autistic people that she can make provisional diagnosis through observation. The other a psychological assessment specialist whom she brought in to confirm or deny her provisional diagnosis.
Guess what? Neither of them think that I am not autistic.
This is six or seven people who have studied at institutions of higher learning, practised in professions where their specific purpose is to explain why a person is having difficulties integrating with the society around them, all agreeing that I am autistic. I am pretty certain that if I were to meet with five or six more people who know their head from their tail concerning autism, in order words their PhD.s are actually worth something, they would agree that I am autistic, too.
Hence, if you think an incompetent slug whose job requirements are the literal equivalent of smashing square pegs into round holes using separationist language and challenging diagnoses makes me not autistic, the burden of evidence does not merely lie with you. You are also under onus to prove that you are not a complete fukking idiot.
In other words, who in the unholy fukk do you think you are?
Normies also suffer from quite a delusional entitlement complex. They seem to think that everywhere they go, they are entitled to be printed/posted and rebutted, or rather agreed with, when they fling abuse at autistic people. They seem to think that an autistic adult who, thanks to the miracle of people being allowed and encouraged to abuse others, had trouble sleeping at night before he knew who Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes were, is going to tell them “yes, masser” when they tell that autistic adult how wrong they are.
Who in the fukk do you think you are?
Which brings us to another tantrum that normies throw when autistic adults try to confront them with the realities of being autistic. The claim that our cries for protection are somehow bogus. Apparently, we are not being openly hunted, so it is all okay.
Now, I will grant this much. Autism genocide is not like other genocides. It is not like the enemy can just scan for us amongst a population, pick us out reliably, and so on. But the organisation Genocide Watch has defined ten stages of genocide, which can be read in this document.
I will list the stages here in order to frame the statement properly. Genocide Watch defines the ten stages thusly:
Classification < Symbolisation < Discrimination < Dehumanisation < Organisation < Polarisation < Preparation < Persecution < Extermination < Denial.
I bolded Polarisation for a reason. One unique feature of the curebies’ campaign of genocide against the autistic is that not only are multiple stages occurring at once, but they are occurring with equal fervor. The highest stage of genocide that is occurring in response to the “autism problem” is Polarisation. I will quote what it says on the page under the heading of Polarisation.
Extremists drive the groups apart. Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda. Laws may forbid intermarriage or social interaction. Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing the center. Moderates from the perpetrators’ own group are most able to stop genocide, so are the first to be arrested and killed. Leaders in targeted groups are the next to be arrested and murdered. The dominant group passes emergency laws or decrees that grants them total power over the targeted group. The laws erode fundamental civil rights and liberties. Targeted groups are disarmed to make them incapable of self-defense, and to ensure that the dominant group has total control. Prevention may mean security protection for moderate leaders or assistance to human rights groups. Assets of extremists may be seized, and visas for international travel denied to them. Coups d’état by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions. Vigorous objections should be raised to disarmament of opposition groups. If necessary they should be armed to defend themselves.
Key to understanding why I believe we are breaking the barrier of the polarisation stage with regard to Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes’ campaign are the words “Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda”.
You want polarising propaganda, here is an example that Goebbels would ejaculate at the sight of.
I will quote the relevant part of the transcript here, because it further illustrates my point.
– woman: Autism? You forget who we are. You forget who you are dealing with. You forget the spirit of mothers…
– all: …and daughters, and fathers, and sons…
– (crosstalk: several people calling out “We are” and the names of different countries)
– all: We are the United Nations.
– man: We are coming together in all climates.
– woman: We call on all faiths.
– woman: We search with technology…
– woman: …and voodoo…
– woman: …prayer and…
– man: …herbs…
– man: …genetic studies…
– woman: …and a growing awareness you never anticipated.
– man: We have had challenges, but we are the best when overcoming them.
– woman: We speak the only language that matters:
– all: Love for our children.
– woman: Our capacity to love is greater than your capacity to overwhelm.
– woman: Autism is naive.
– woman: You are alone.
– man: We are a community of warriors.
– all: We have a voice.
– woman: You think that because some of our children cannot speak, we cannot hear them. That is autism’s weakness.
– woman: You think that because my child lives behind a wall, I am afraid to knock it down with my bare hands.
– man: You have not properly been introduced to this community…
– all: …of parents and grandparents, of siblings and friends and schoolteachers, therapists, pediatricians, and scientists.
– woman: Autism, if you are not scared, you should be.
– man: When you came for my child, you forgot:
– all: You came for me.
– woman: Autism: Are you listening?
Many objections have been voiced by the autistic community, and just having this transcript here where I have to look at it makes me angry. But in order to illustrate my point, I have to make comment.
Firstly, note how this transcript makes very clear that Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes addresses “autism” as if it is a living, separate entity from autistic people. In face to face conversations I have had with Doctor Anthony Attwood, I have proposed the definition of “a series of structural mutations in the brain that have varied effects”. Or something similar.
A further point that is in direct opposition to the content of this transcription is that autistic people see being autistic very differently to how Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes sees it. Even bolding, underlining, and putting that statement in thousand-point type could not possibly give proper emphasis to that statement. Autistic people attempt with incredible regularity to speak not only to Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes but people who do not know anything about autism, and Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes constantly endeavour to exclude those autistic people from the conversation. I know of no organisation that actually helps the people whom it claims to help and excludes those people from the conversation about the subject with which the help is solicited. Organisations that say “we want ten thousand dollars to rid this person of this undesired characteristic” and refuse to talk to or allow that person to talk to the audience should not be allowed to call themselves charitable organisations.
Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes apparently disagrees. They seem to want to think, and want others to think that autism is something that latches onto people and has a mind/consciousness of their own.
What they either do not know or care about is that by addressing “autism” in this threatening manner, they are also addressing autistic people in this threatening manner. This makes sense when you consider my definition: structural mutation in the brain with varied effects. I estimate, based on my experiences, that my amygdalae are less than half the size that they should be, whereas the part of my brain that processes visual data and creates imagined imagery based on words, sounds, or smells is at least four times as big as the expected norm. Oh yeah, and the part of my brain that processes smells is about the size of the insulin lispro molecule.
Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes would like you to believe that these unusual configurations of the structure of my brain are a separate thing to me that somehow dragged me off from the park one day and replaced me with the me that is here now.
Two things come to mind in response. One, can you think of a more absurd proposition? Two, exactly how stupid do you have to be in order to not believe this closely matches the definitions of Dehumanisation and Polarisation?
Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes love to threaten autistic people in this veiled, euphemistic manner constantly. It is like a game to them.
So when I say that Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes’ ambitions differ from those of the Nazi Party only in terms of their ability to carry them out, that is not conjecture. It is a logical conclusion based upon their own words. The fact that Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes
- Have connections in the media that allow them to push their propaganda into the public sphere without challenge before the fact
- Are rich enough to own large corporations which, ironically, manufacture goods that have a large chance of never existing if not for autistic people
- Have people who want to have the word “President” amended to their names thanking them to the press and turning up to their events
Oh yeah, Genocide Watch also has a document called Twelve Ways To Deny Genocide. It is a listing of the techniques that people who want to deny a genocide is occurring or has occurred use. Three particular techniques in this list are occurring already, all of them used by Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes.
4. Emphasise the strangeness of the victims < 10. Claim that what is going on does not fit the defintion of genocide < 11. Blame the victims
People who write in and puke shit like challenges to my seven-times over diagnosis or whatever also act in ways that meet the above definition.
I am not going to sit here and tell you what you want to hear, normie. Not now, not ever. You are also not entitled to space on my journal. If you want to rebut my criticisms of Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes and people who support them, get your own journal and rebut them there.
In this entry I have stated that the burden of proof to deny my (seven times over, let us not forget) diagnosis rests with you. That means you are obliged to offer evidence to back up your claims. Whether the evidence is to discredit mine or to present an alternate theory is up to you. But know this: when Anthony Attwood and Isabelle Hénault agree that a man in his mid-twenties that they have spoken with at length is autistic, that makes it a pretty “done deal” in the eyes of the law.
Similarly, the burden of proof concerning the evil of Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes has been met in abundance. The video that I quoted the transcript from is just one of many, many gestures Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes has made that translate to “exterminate the autie”. (Read that in a Dalek voice to get the meaning.) (A real Dalek voice, I mean.)
Regarding the asshole bully teacher that I have openly stated I would go back in time and vote for Hitler to prevent the existence of:
- Jokes that reference Anal Cunt songs are apparently over some heads. Go figure.
- David Shuster is a child abuser and deserves to be treated as such. Anyone who argues otherwise is part of child abuse culture, and deserves to be treated as such.
And one other thing, normie idiots who think my journal is theirs. When you kick a big dog repeatedly throughout the developmental stages of his life, and he starts biting people who come near him when he is an adult, it is your fault for having kicked him so much. It is not his fault for having bitten people.
I do not expect you to be clever enough to get the point of that, but I sure as hell hope others around you understand it well enough to keep children as far from you as possible. Even I agree that the world needs less people reaching adulthood with the kinds of feelings people like you have put into me.
- My journal is not your journal. If you want to be quoted in my comments section, you better have a damned compelling thing to say that furthers discussion. Not “I am automatically right because I am a normie”.
- Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes are evil. They have proven themselves to be evil with their own words and actions. They have also made it clear that they intend to enact behaviours that are persecutory in nature.
- Autistic people have a right to defend themselves from Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes and people who support ASFNA. If it really bothers you that much that people are visibly chomping at the bit to be granted easy means to do this, perhaps you ought to turn your eyes toward Autism Speaks For Normie Assholes and ask “why are your behaviours bothering these people you claim to be helping so much?” instead of throwing tantrums at the protesters.
- Who the fukk do you think you are?
In fact, stop reading my journal altogether. I do not want Human shit like you in my audience. Never have, and never will.
Finally, piss off.